On 06/08/13 03:30, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 20:51 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 16:28:00 +0100
Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> wrote:
On Dom, 2013-08-04 at 13:03 +0000, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Sun Aug 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: po4a-0.44-10.fc20.noarch (build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl
(build)
DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: libperl.so
DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl
(build)
debconf building is failing because po4a was fail too , isn't it ?
and also perl-Qt seems is not in F20 updated .
perl-Qt has test suite failures with Perl 5.18.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 for status of the
Perl 5.18 rebuild.
Hi, in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 I see po-debconf,
it depends on po4a and perl-Qt . po4a-0.44-11 was rebuilt successfully
with perl 5.18 , but po-debconf tried to use po4a-0.44-10
The latest po-debconf build I can see
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5743618) used
po4a-0.44-11 and didn't appear to use perl-Qt at all. The build failed
for what appear to be non-Perl -related reasons.
In list is missing (at least) debconf,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13893
I just check now, also needs perl-Qt-devel
debconf can't build yet because perl-Qt is still broken. I don't know if
Petr will be adding packages to the list on the wiki page if they can't
be built simply because their dependencies have issues rather than being
directly incompatible with Perl 5.18. Or at least not until the first
attempt has been done at building all the Perl packages.
and debhelper builds
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=16206
are in wrong order ..., ausil rebuild first than ppisar.
as ausil build fail , shouldn't be resubmitted by ausil ?
I don't expect ausil to resubmit anything. The Perl SIG members will
probably do so where possible. However, I don't see much activity
upstream for PerlQT so there may not be a fix for that (and its
dependencies) any time soon.
Paul.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
