On 08/27/2013 11:20 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 14:54 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >> Is it not better to drop entirely graphics drivers that do not have kms >> support and at the *same time* adopt the policy >> >> "From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will >> be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution" > > I don't know why that would be "better". There's no intrinsic reason > why we should forbid UMS drivers if there's a maintainer, it doesn't > necessarily make my life harder to allow that. And, given that the list > _does_ include hardware that people have filed bugs about in recent > memory, I figure I should allow those interested in to step forward. > > - ajax > Sorry to come out of left field like this, but would the system profile info we collect on install be useful in determining the weight of the need for some of these drivers? For example, if there is still a bunch of SIS video adapters out there, we might prioritize support for that driver, but then not for others that don't show-up in our hardware surveys.
Perhaps this step has already been taken. -- Libre Video http://librevideo.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
