On 10/07/2013 03:49 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500
Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in
f20+rawhide, for whatever reasons.
Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not complain.
There are no AutoQA comments in that bodhi ticket at all. Almost as
if AutoQA has not been run for that update. Normally it would add a
comment also for PASSED tests.
Is AutoQA enabled globally yet? Last I knew, it was an opt-in
service.
AutoQA is run globally on all current fedora branches other than
rawhide but if maintainers want results emailed to them, it's opt-in.
Bummer - Why? Isn't it AutoQA's job is to catch "must-not-happen"
package bugs, i.e. to be *mandatory*?
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
