On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> > So whatever options virt-manager is using to create qcow2 files, is either > the same as -o preallocation=metadata,compat=1.1,lazy_refcounts=on, or any > difference in options isn't making a difference in performance. The 37 second > performance difference is probably due to less disk contention from the > source ISO being on a separate drive this time around. And if I'm right about > all of that, then the overwhelming gain is coming from unsafe cache. My original 1h41s result I reported was based on a qcow2 file that I made using qemu-img without metadata preallocation, not the virt-manager UI. So the above assertion that most gain is coming from unsafe cache was premature. Here's the retesting: btrfs partitions default guided to qcow2 (libvirt unsafe cache, virt-manager default qcow2 creation) anaconda.log "Running Thread: AnaInstallThread" = 15:56:02 anaconda.log "Thread Done: AnaConfigurationThread" = 16:12:46 00:16:44 btrfs partitions default guided to qcow2 (libvirt unsafe cache, qemu-img qcow2 creation with no options) anaconda.log "Running Thread: AnaInstallThread" = 17:18:10 anaconda.log "Thread Done: AnaConfigurationThread" = 17:35:23 00:17:13 That's significantly more justification to suggest most of the gain over the first 1h41m case was overwhelming due to the use of the 'none' cache setting; and qcow2 metadata preallocation is not nearly as significant a factor. Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
