----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kamil Paral" <kpa...@redhat.com> > To: "Fedora QA Development" <qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org>, "Josef > Skladanka" <jskla...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:00:33 PM > Subject: Re: Taskotron wiki page > > > I also updated > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Tools > > > > with the list of our current projects. If you see something missing, please > > add it. Thanks. > > > > Josef, I find this quite confusing: > > https://bitbucket.org/rajcze/resultsdb > https://bitbucket.org/rajcze/resultsdb_api > https://bitbucket.org/rajcze/resultsdb_frontend > https://fedorahosted.org/ResultsDB/ > https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/ResultsDB.git > > What is the canonical source? Where should people report issues? Please, pick > one location to keep the project in (it seems we're going bitbucket, or > bitbucket+phab way) and kill the other site. Also make sure issues can't be > reported on two different places, and forward people to the single one. And > make sure your wiki page points to a correct location: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ResultsDB > (I updated it before learning there are other sources of ResultsDB. You might > have some more under your sleeve.) > > Thanks. > > As a general note, I'm not fully happy when the source code lives somewhere > else than the issues do. It confuses people. But if we want to keep > easy-to-browse-and-fork functionality (bitbucket) and full-featured-review > functionality (phab), it seems we don't have much choice. At least we should > always disable the issue support on bitbucket for every project.
Weren't we going to move repos to phab as well? M. _______________________________________________ qa-devel mailing list qa-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
