Thorsten Leemhuis <fed...@leemhuis.info> wrote: >On 25.01.2014 17:35, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 11:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >>> Debian, who has a similar stance on >>> non-free Software, does a way better job in that area than Fedora >does. >> Well, not really - they don't have a 'similar stance', they have an >> official non-free repository. That's kind of a significant >> difference. :) > >Ha, Debian and Fedora, the distributions, are imo not that different >after a standard install (but yes, there are differences as well - >patents strategy, Firmware). But yes, you are right, the Debian project >has a a official non-free repository, which is a significant difference >to the Fedora project. One that leads to a better user experience; >something that afics a lot of Fedora users and some Fedoraproject >developers want to see as well.
Let's avoid personal examples. I also know many users and Fedora contributors that respect Fedora's foundations and would probably leave Fedora if these were to change. > That's why I think it would be good if >the the Fedora project might help/guide in that are, even if the >resulting repo and the main work is done outside of the Fedora project. I agree with guidance. I don't think anyone would object to help them, so that *they* can ship their software for Fedora in a more UX friendly way. -- devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct