2014-03-26 8:47 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Bridon <boche...@fedoraproject.org>:
> On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 08:27 +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
[snip]
>> I think the same, if all spins become products we can also keep the
>> actual way. Fedora.next is a very good idea and I'm sure it will have
>> success, but it needs to follow his strategy with three different
>> products, not having 2 different ones and *n*
>> workstation-similar-products, IMHO.
>
> Some spins won't be desktop-related.

Yes sure, I was thinking about desktop spins.

> Maybe what we'd need is something like AUR where users contribute
> packages for Arch Linux which are not "supported" enough to be in the
> main repositories?
>
> We could have the official 3 (for now) products, and a different "place"
> where the wider community can gather to publish different images, each
> one with a different focus (e.g a KDE desktop, or a tailor-made cloud
> image for a new provider, or an arch-specific image for a
> yet-unsupported device, or...)
>
> We could even call that "place" spins.fedoraproject.org ;)
>
> It could be more open than the current spins process, allowing a wider
> community to publish more varied things than we have now (more spins!),
> and it would be up to each group to ensure the quality of what they
> produce, have their own release cycle, etc...
>
>
> --
> Mathieu

Why not, I would feel much more comfortable with this kind of solution
or something similar than having a lot of main products. I would also
like this because we could have more images for different focus, and
at this point we probably should also keep only the 3 main products as
release-blockers.

-- 
Robert Mayr
(robyduck)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to