On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > Hello, > 2014-04-24 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lukáš Nykrýn <lnyk...@redhat.com>: > > > We must keep initscripts support, but I can imagine a setup where every > > service uses a systemd unit, so this part does not have to be installed by > > default, but could be pulled in as a dependency. > > > > Are you sure? If you take an existing RPM that ships a sysv file, that's > alone an indication that it probably hasn't been significantly reworked, so > noone is likely to have added an explicit requires: on "this part". For > extra credit, make sure that this works correctly with LSB-compliant RPMs > that do nothing not required by LSB. >
I may be wrong but I believe we could update our dependency-detection scripts to note when a package ships an init script and add the requirement automatically. As long as there's a mass rebuild between now and shipping that should take care of everyone. --CJD
pgp0GQ_7Ia4Dx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
