On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 12:16 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 04/30/2014 01:17 AM, P J P wrote: > >> On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 3:18 AM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > >> On my home LAN, I run my own DNSSEC-enabled server using F20 & bind 9. > >> This local server also is my DHCP and Samba server. As usual, dynamic > >> clients receive the LAN local domain ID and DNS server ID > >> automatically. > >> > >> How does this proposed change affect my clients, or especially my > >> server (which uses NetworkManager (not Network), and a static IP > >> address? > > > > This should work just fine. If you upgrade your F20 machine to say F22, > > it would have the default resolver running on 127.0.0.1:53 with its entry > > in '/etc/resolv.conf'. One change you would need to do is to make it listen > > on 0.0.0.0:53 or the on static IP address of your server. Your clients > > won't know that they are talking to a different DNS resolver. > > > > If your clients are upgraded to F22, NetworkManager there would make the > > local resolver talk to the one on your server, because it'll receive that > > name server configuration via DHCP. > > I think the parent post is refering to the local domain name, I have > read this thread and people talk about not touching ever the resolv.conf > file. What about domain and search lines? If NetworkManager will always > use 127.0.0.1, it should still modify resolv.conf with the domain name > received from DHCP
Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ? By default you wouldn't want that as you roam with a fedora laptop on completely untrusted dhcp networks that can push whatever crap as a search path. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
