2014-05-05 22:03 GMT+02:00 Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org>:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>
> wrote:
> > Am 05.05.2014 21:45, schrieb Kay Sievers:
> >> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Miller <
> mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> And calling /usr/libexec "Fedora-only" is of course kind of
> >>> funny.
> >>
> >> "libexec" is Fedora-only, no other major distro used it, not even LSB
> >> allowed it.
>
> > you systemd-guys are really funny - /run was okay and FHS did
> > not matter because it don't get often enough updates and was in
> > your way, libexec is not OK because you don't like itand prefer
> > to fix things which ain't broken - wheter it's part of a proposed
> > FHS update and from where it comes
>
> It is not about being funny, it is about making reasonable decisions.
> /run solved a huge old problem, libexec is pointless and only creates
> needless and nothing but annoying differences.
>
Nah. /usr/libexec is a good place to store system-wide helper binaries
without having to worry about the patch changing due to multilib; remember
systemd has had to receive an explicit exception[1] for its scheme of
storing everything-in /usr/lib/systemd as if it were /opt/systemd, with
many of the files located there violating the intent of FHS.
Mirek
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/969
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
