On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 17:51 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > It's kind of implicit in the Change proposal. When you submit a > > Change, you are indicating that you want this to be something that > > Fedora promotes (both from an engineering standpoint and a marketing one).
> I modifed the Change text to indicate that it is an alternative to > exisiting solutions, and can be used in parallel. Just as a note for future messaging purposes: the Server product's tech spec explicitly nominates rsyslog as the supported remote logging mechanism for Server. We did explicitly choose between rsyslog and the new native systemd capability, and chose rsyslog at least until the native systemd capability is a bit more mature. No specific immediate impact or 'required action' here, just wanted to note it for anyone following this discussion for purposes of future public communication. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
