Am 12.06.2014 16:28, schrieb Jan Zelený: > On 12. 6. 2014 at 10:11:40, Chuck Anderson wrote: >> At least "systemctl" is generic unlike "dnf". And systemctl is much >> more of a change from the way "service" works that it warranted a >> change of name. "yum" and "dnf" both work pretty much the same way >> from the user's perspective, so it is not a good argument to change >> the name. > > Actually it is. The "pretty much" part is exactly the reason why to change > the > name. If we didn't, a ton of users who are not reading this conversation > would > start filing regression bugs. If we set their expectations right, warning > them > that yum is no more, they are far less likely to do so.
wrong * you get that regression bugs anyways * the only thing what you are doing is spread confusion in case of "set their expectations right" * why was GNOME3 not renamed * why was KDE4 not renamed * why was Apache 2.4 not renamed the only expectation a user has is that behavior don't change and features / options are not removed and called "improvement"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
