Am 28.09.2014 um 20:13 schrieb Carlos O'Donell: > On 09/28/2014 01:24 PM, drago01 wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Carlos O'Donell <car...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 09/26/2014 02:34 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >>>> Developers. >>>> >>>> Testers wanted immediately for: >>>> >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.18-16.fc20 >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.20-4.fc21 >>> >>> For FC21 was missed a case where TSX was being used and had >>> to push one more update -5 to cover this case. >> >> Does that update still make sense given that the kernel / dracut >> update enables early microcode loading? > > What about the case where the user runs a custom kernel?
then he needs to build it right don't get me wrong but you can't seriously disable TSX completly because a *possible* out-of-distribution kernel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
