On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:22:04PM +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 18 December 2014 at 10:18, Bastien Nocera <bnoc...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > I get confused by the upstream vs. Fedora requirements, > >> They are the same thing, no? > > You tell me ;) > > Yes, they are :) > > >> Would a generated HTML page ... be a useful thing to do? > > That would be useful indeed, as long as it doesn't require too much work. > > This was a few minutes work: > https://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f22/matrix.html > ideas of other things to show most welcome.
I'm a bit confused by this. For emacs the output is: emacs emacs OK OK OK OK Warning OK emacsclient emacs OK Warning Warning OK Warning Failed But emacsclient does not have an appdata file at all. It something wrong with its .desktop file? For zaz: zaz zaz OK OK OK Failed Warning Failed The appdata file passed appdata-validate test a few weeks ago. Is this things about missing icons something new or is this a false positive? > >> Doesn't dumping the updated AppData file in /usr/share/appdata work? > > I don't know. Does it? :) > > Yes, it does. Good to know. This wasn't obvious. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
