The fact that there isn't a popular 3rd-party repo packaging Chromium does not appear to be relevant to Fedora. I don't see anybody discouraging it. Perhaps you should approach a popular 3rd-party to suggestion packaging Chromium in their repos?
http://rpmfusion.org/ is one such standard 3rd-party repo for Fedora users. Perhaps you can contribute packaging for Chromium to their project? -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, john.tiger <john.tigernas...@gmail.com> wrote: > I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party > available for F21 is not acceptable - > > ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet > thunderbird, dnf, etc is ... - I'm seeing a kernel problem warning > WARNING: CPU 0 PID 1419 at drivers.net.wireless/ath/ath9k.recv > > point is, browser choice is important and Chromium on my F20 is working. > > Also as developers, we need to work with all browsers. > > Even if Fedora does not elect to maintain packages for Chromium, there > should be some effort to work with or encourage a 3rd party or fix whatever > package might be holding up someone else from implementing it (ie if it's > clang compiling or whatever. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
