On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Gerald B. Cox <gb...@bzb.us> wrote: > Yes, I looked at that bug report and the somewhat terse response. I thought > I'd post here first before I went the bugzilla route. > > Based upon the information I discovered tonight it seems a bit puzzling it > isn't included. Seriously, Ubuntu includes it and we don't? > Google is using it for the Nexus 9? The "experimental" rationale just > doesn't hold weight - especially since we are allowing for > BTRFS Raid5/6; which is made out to be toxic. If it's good enough for > Google and ahem: "Ubuntu" - it's beyond ridiculous we don't have it.
So you looked at a bug that is a year and a half old, around the time when F2FS was very new and under a lot of work, and assumed that nothing could have possibly changed? Maybe instead of getting angry and incredulous, you could actually leave a comment in the bug or open a new RFE bug to have it enabled. If you do, highlighting your findings without the snarky and aggressive tone would probably help your case. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
