If they are out of support, I don't think they should be easy to access.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> > wrote: > >> Isn't it true the install media ISOs are available indefinitely? And >> if so the security cat is already out of the bag, so that's not a very >> good argument. I'd say if we wanted to do something better it would be >> an image that's usable for both VM and containers, and would be the >> state of that version at the time it went EOL, i.e. it has all >> available updates baked into it. And then de-emphasize the original >> ISO as the way to run older versions of Fedora. >> >> >> Chris Murphy >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> > > I tend to agree with the rest of the choir here in saying we shouldn't > make it easier for people to use EOL releases. It will likely add > unnecessary burdens onto us and our systems when people come to ask about > EOL Fedora releases in Docker. Not to mention, we should be encouraging > people to move up, not stay put. > > Honestly, I think if people need a platform that lasts a long time, they > should be looking at CentOS with EPEL, SCLs, and/or other repos depending > on what they need. > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- -Jon Disnard
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct