On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro> wrote:

> To understand the work this has created for Debian users and
> maintainers, you may want to review this bug report which has ultimately
> been traced to bundled library issues:
>
> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=501318
>

Hey Daniel,

Thanks...Sorry, I had missed your post earlier; and it's clear it isn't the
friendliest application for packaging in a Linux distro; but progress is
slowly being made.

On the positive side, for those who'd like to give it a spin, Tom's copr is
great.
If you're coming from Chrome, it's a fairly seamless transition.
Everything just works
(at least as far as I can tell); and it looks and acts identical.
Extensions are all there,
PepperFlash, no issues.  If you've already got Chrome, just:

ln -s /opt/google/chrome-unstable/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/PepperFlash/
ln -s /opt/google/chrome-unstable/PepperFlash/manifest.json
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/PepperFlash/

It's impressive.  He really did an excellent job.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to