On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:34:14 -0600 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21 > > depcheck libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21(x86_64) a > day ago > > shows passed: > > TAP version 13 > 1..1 > ok - depcheck for Koji build libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21 > --- > arch: x86_64 > item: libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21 > outcome: PASSED > type: koji_build > ... > > But: > > Error: Package: 1:libreoffice-calc-4.3.7.2-9.fc21.x86_64 > (@updates-testing) Requires: libwps-0.3.so.3()(64bit) > Removing: libwps-0.3.1-1.fc21.x86_64 > (@fedora-21-updates-x86_64) libwps-0.3.so.3()(64bit) > Updated By: libwps-0.4.1-1.fc21.x86_64 (updates-testing) > ~libwps-0.4.so.4()(64bit) > Available: libwps-0.3.0-3.fc21.x86_64 (fedora) > libwps-0.3.so.3()(64bit) > After looking into this, I'm starting to think this isn't a depcheck failure as much as it is a difference between yum and dnf - I assume that you used yum to do the attempted update to libwps-0.4? On a F21 system, if I do 'repoquery --whatrequires libwps', I get the following: # repoquery --whatrequires libwps calligra-words-0:2.8.6-1.fc21.x86_64 calligra-words-0:2.9.6-1.fc21.x86_64 libreoffice-calc-1:4.3.2.2-5.fc21.x86_64 libreoffice-calc-1:4.3.7.2-9.fc21.x86_64 libreoffice-writer-1:4.3.2.2-5.fc21.x86_64 libreoffice-writer-1:4.3.7.2-9.fc21.x86_64 libwps-devel-0:0.3.0-3.fc21.i686 libwps-devel-0:0.3.0-3.fc21.x86_64 libwps-devel-0:0.3.1-1.fc21.i686 libwps-devel-0:0.3.1-1.fc21.x86_64 libwps-tools-0:0.3.0-3.fc21.x86_64 libwps-tools-0:0.3.1-1.fc21.x86_64 writerperfect-0:0.9.2-3.fc21.x86_64 writerperfect-epub-0:0.9.2-3.fc21.x86_64 If I do the same query using dnf on a F22 system, I get: # dnf repoquery --whatrequires libwps Last metadata expiration check performed 1:25:08 ago on Wed Aug 26 15:25:25 2015. # echo $? 0 depcheck effectively uses the same depsolver that dnf uses and that is not the same depsolving algorithm used by yum. If dnf is fine installing the update, depcheck isn't going to complain. When I look into the specfile of libreoffice in the f21 branch, I don't actually see a Requires on libwps for fedora, just a BuildRequires: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libreoffice.git/tree/libreoffice.spec?h=f21#n209 If I'm reading the situation correctly, this isn't something that depcheck should or could have caught. Assuming that the libreoffice spec isn't missing a Requires on libwps, this likely means that libreoffice would be FTBFS for at least f21 with the new libwps in updates-testing. Tim
pgpOdhyBlc9sr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
