On 10/09/15 17:46, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 10.09.2015 um 17:38 schrieb David Sommerseth: >> On 10/09/15 15:31, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as >>> /var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages? >>> >>> frankly it's impossible to write worksheets as admin what happened in >>> the last few weeks with such needless verbose logging >> >> Did you take a look at /var/log/dnf.rpm.log? > > no, because i did not assume it's existence
Presumptions never reveals the truth. Honestly, it took me 5 seconds to figure out this. This rant takes me minutes. > one example of a not well thought change That's an opinion - without much food for thought. > yum -> dnf > yum.log -> dnf.log > > that would be logical (given that it's still not understandable change > the name) but that new log should be called "dnf.debug.log" and frankly > *not* exist in a enduser *default* install That is how you would solve it. Just bite the bitter apple, that not everybody thinks in the same ways as you do. For me looking for /var/log/dnf* actually made the dnf.rpm.log file the obvious place to look for where rpm operations was involved. But hey, that's me! Life usually moves forward and things evolve - embrace it! Disgruntlement mostly makes just you unhappy. -- kind regards, David Sommerseth -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
