On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:38:31PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >bundling out. Second, it demonstrates a case where it'd be better if > >the bundling had been documented, because it would have shown up in a > >query when the security team was working on that vulnerability > > the last part *only* works *if* it had been documented > > nothing of the whole thread solves the problem of unintentionally > bundeling becaue missing knowledge or just not care about it > > in a perfect world upsteram would not write crap which needs to be > unbundeled as well as maintainers would not bundle withoput > intemtion by missing knowledge - nothing of that is solved or > targeted
That's a good point; it's not in the scope of this proposal. However, it does fit with what Matthias said earier in this thread — automation is key. We definitely have some pieces of that puzzle already — I'd love to hear about a project to put them together. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
