On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:24:43PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I am trying to upgrade to F23 (I know still not finished but...) > > In past I always done 'distro-sync'. Albeit with yum. > > Now I tried: > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync --best > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync --best > --allowerasing > > And all of them fail. See below for full log. > > On the other hand: > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 > succeed. > > Actually most of the problem are caused by retired or obsoleted packages. E.g > fedup-dracut or rubygem-celluloid (this > one reported as BZ 1275030). FTR, fedup-dracut was obsoleted today morning (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275085).
> My question is should we use --distro-sync at all? Are users supposed to > remove obsoleted packages manually? --distro-sync is now (in git, I don't think this version was released yet) the default in dnf-plugin-system-upgrade. > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync --best > --allowerasing > Error: package rubygem-celluloid-0.15.2-2.fc22.noarch requires > rubygem(timers) < 1.2, but none of the providers can be > installed. > package fedup-dracut-0.9.2-1.fc22.x86_64 requires librpm.so.3()(64bit), but > none of the providers can be installed What version of dnf/libsolv are you using? The last update (libsolv-0.6.14-2.fc22,dnf-1.1.3-1.fc22) solved a bunch of upgrade problems. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
