Fedora, officially, supports Grubby. There was a different thread saying "This is silly, why are we sticking with grubby?" and what I got out of that thread was: there's some use case that grub2-mkconfig doesnt support, but that grubby does, and Fedora wants to support that use case. Frankly, the fact that you had the say phrase: "users are asking for trouble by using upstream-supported tools", just screams "clusterf***" to me as an end-user. I can't tell you -who- is holding said cluster, whether its upstream or downstream, but it needs to get sorted-- especially given the emphasis the Fedora places upon staying as close to upstream as possible.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Eric Griffith <egriffit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Grub2-mkconfig works fine on F23. Maybe not for complex operations but > for > > general modifications to /etc/default/grub it creates a perfectly working > > grub.cfg > > Sure, but do we support grub2-mkconfig? > > If yes, why don't we use it for real. If no, then users are asking > for trouble by using upstream-supported tools. > > --Andy > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
