Am 16.01.2016 um 14:34 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
Here are a small collection of subject lines of emails sent automatically to me by various Fedora systems in the past few days: Subject: upgradepath PASSED for FEDORA-2015-850e89be8b Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment] auto-buildrequires-1.2-1.fc23 Subject: rjones's libguestfs-1.33.1-2.fc24 completed Subject: rpmlint PASSED for libguestfs-1.33.1-2.fc24 Subject: Broken dependencies: libguestfs Subject: ABRT report for package gnome-boxes has reached 10 occurrences Subject: [Bug 1269975] svirt very occasionally prevents parallel libvirt [..] Subject: Fedora 'packager' sponsor needed for suanand Subject: sailer's mingw-sqlite-3.10.1.0-1.fc24 failed to build Subject: libguestfs's builds are back to normal in f24 Subject: dchen pushed to ocaml-lwt (el6). "New upstream version 2.2.0." The only consistent thing is there's nothing consistent about them :-/ I'd like to propose a very lightweight "standard" for subject lines of emails. (1) The first word should be the package name which the email concerns
in context of that the subjects below needs to be fixed listing all subpackages and exceed TWO KILOBYTE subject header because place the package in front would prevent to see anything else (in case of other packages not exceeding 2048 byte but have subpackages too)
Jan 7 05:23:03 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[2859]: 3pbZDQ6RR5z2B: reject: header Subject: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] kf5-kdoctools-5.18.0-1.fc23 kf5-kdbusaddons-5.18.0-1.fc23 kf5-kio-5.18.0-1.fc23 kf5-kjsembed-5.18.0-1.fc23 kf5-ktextwidgets-5.18.0-1.fc23 kf5-kidletime-5. from bastion01.fedoraproject.org[209.132.181.2]; from=<upda...@fedoraproject.org> to=<h.rei...@thelounge.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<bastion.fedoraproject.org>: 5.7.1 Administrative Prohibition (Subject-Header Too Long)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
