2016-01-16 18:49 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com>:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:23:54 +0100
> Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:14:03 +0100
>> Peter Lemenkov <lemen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello All!
>> > I'm afraid I'm stuck with one of my packages. It fails to build on
>> > i686 in Rawhide but builds fine if koji was started with
>> > --arch-override=i686 (no other builds in parallel).
>> >
>> > I suppose I run into some "limits exceeded" issue. Unfortunately all
>> > I've got is the segfault during the documentation build.
>>
>> hmm, OOM killer in kernel in action? because both i686 and x86_64
>> tasks have used buildhw-11.phx2.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> > Technically I could disable docs on i686, but I really don't want
>> > to. Could someone take a look inside - what's going on there?
>> >
>> > Here is my latest build attempt:
>> >
>> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12563046
>
> Doesn't seem to be OOM to me... in the i686 build.log:
>
> /bin/sh: line 6: 18505 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) erl -boot
> start_clean -noshell -pa ebin -s erl_html_tools top_index
> src /builddir/build/BUILD/otp-OTP-18.2.2 ../html 18 -s erlang halt
>
> Is the difference between a working and failed i686 build if it gets a
> buildvm or buildhw?

The only difference was --arch-override=i686 for a successful build.

This was an out-of-memory issue. I've changed Java environmental
variables from -Xmx1024m to -Xmx512m and it builds fine now!

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12578827

Although I think it's safe to say that the issue is fixed now
(workaround applied).  I'd like to have more details about Koji jobs.

Also it would be great if different build tasks won't interfere with
each other. I suppose that the limits should be applied to each
arch-build separately rather than for the entire task.

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to