On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 05:40:07PM -0800, Alex Gagniuc wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Till Maas <opensou...@till.name> > wrote:
> # Zero-day patches after 0.3.0 release. Extract using: > # $ git clone git://sigrok.org/pulseview.git > # $ cd pulseview > # $ git checkout a1a3656b4e18cb9fc078a51bf4256066ee307620 > # $ git format-patch pulseview-0.3.0 These instructions are great. Btw. I was told on IRC that there might be a bugfix sigrok release soonish that includes these fixes. > yes, I have an IRC bouncer server, so I was able to find your question > after some grepping. It was posted before dawn in my timezone, so I > wouldn't have had a chance to respond anyhow. Since I assumed that you would like it if pulseview was fixed and the update complete. > > Also pushing > > dependent builds in separate updates is against best practices as this > > will lead to broken updates. > > I haven't been able to stay up-to date with the latest and greatest > guidelines in the past several years due to jobs, military training, > etc, though I'm always looking for hints on how to improve the process > of pushing out these updates. Probably everyone has not enough time to keep up with everything. I am sure that some of my packages are also still using %doc instead of %license, since I update this when I need to update the package anyhow - and sometimes someone else is kind enough to do it. However, I guess I was not clear enough about the updates bundling. You should publish all related builds in one update, i.e. add the sigrok-cli build to the big other update. This ensures that all builds are pushed together and avoids that only some of the builds are updated on a system breaking the other tools. Kind Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
