Pádraig Brady wrote: >> This gives even better results: >> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/230975/ >> http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/042407-kernel.html >> >> The PSS and USS are are the Right Thing: they give users and >> developers a honest and accurate figure. >> >> The downside is that it would require a very fresh kernel or 13 >> invasive VM patches. >> > > I've just updated my ps_mem.py tool to use PSS when available: > http://www.pixelbeat.org/scripts/ps_mem.py
Cool! But I don't see the PSS support in 2.6.23, and the patchset originally posted on the lkml is stale. Where does up-to-date kernel support for PSS live? -- // Bernardo Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ One Laptop Per Child - http://www.laptop.org/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
