Andrew Morton wrote: > But otoh the patch at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/16/306 looks sufficiently > simple that if people find it to be useful then the world wouldn't end if we > merged it. > > But it is a feature and hence isn't appropriate for 2.6.23.
Yeah, I propose it for mm. > So. You _think_ that this feature might be useful to you. But are you > sure? Will it be 100% sufficient for your needs over the next N years? > Will it tell you everything which you want to know? Come on, we can't realistically be this much confident about anything we do, especially when it comes to software (-: PSS is the honest memory usage figure any user and developer always wanted to see in the top utility. Death to RSS and VM! -- \__/ |__| Bernardo Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \__\ One Laptop Per Child - http://www.laptop.org/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
