We need to submit patches upstream at some point after Update.1. Marco
On Dec 19, 2007 3:44 PM, Reinier Heeres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jani, > > That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like > this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source. > The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new > options --disable-binary and --enable-embed to just build things > relevant for an embedded version. You can check out the modifications in > my git repo: http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/rwh/evince;a=summary > > Maybe we can discuss this on IRC? I'm rwh there in #olpc and #sugar. > > Cheers, > Reinier > > Jani Monoses wrote: > > > Reinier Heeres wrote: > > > >> Jani, > >> > >> Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already > >> > > > > I was referring to the GNOME svn upstream, and whether plain evince > > tarballs will be usable for wrapping in sugar if built with certain > > configure options. I'd like to reuse as many of the existing system > > packages for ubuntu debs and I suppose most distros which will include > > sugar would will as little duplication of upstream packages as well. > > > > Jani > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
