Anything planned on this? Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > We need to submit patches upstream at some point after Update.1. > > Marco > > On Dec 19, 2007 3:44 PM, Reinier Heeres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jani, >> >> That would be awesome, and in fact we were hoping that something like >> this was possible. I made only minor adjustments to the latest source. >> The biggest changes are in configure.ac and Makefile.am: there are new >> options --disable-binary and --enable-embed to just build things >> relevant for an embedded version. You can check out the modifications in >> my git repo: http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/rwh/evince;a=summary >> >> Maybe we can discuss this on IRC? I'm rwh there in #olpc and #sugar. >> >> Cheers, >> Reinier >> >> Jani Monoses wrote: >> >>> Reinier Heeres wrote: >>> >>>> Jani, >>>> >>>> Which upstream are you referring to? The newer evince version is already >>>> >>> I was referring to the GNOME svn upstream, and whether plain evince >>> tarballs will be usable for wrapping in sugar if built with certain >>> configure options. I'd like to reuse as many of the existing system >>> packages for ubuntu debs and I suppose most distros which will include >>> sugar would will as little duplication of upstream packages as well. >>> >>> Jani >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >>
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
