2008-01-17T17:31:38 Ricardo Carrano: > Ok, but let's not be radical relativists. Nobody would agree that > pornography (to give an example) would belong in the wiki.
Understood. And I'm not arguing for (or against) doom; I've never seen it. What scares me is precedent that anybody can say "I feel that's inappropriate" and we all say, Ok. Take the intersection of just that material that's acceptable to everyone, everywhere, and what's left? Before we all smugly pull a Jack Thompson and say "that's obviously inappropriate, and if you don't agree you are wrong", is there any chance we could discuss criteria? Of course, if we're gonna say "it's obvious", the we clearly oughta kick Browse. Look at all the horrible violence that's out there. news.google.com is horrific. -Bennett
pgpUm5nx5ZFu7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
