On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:29:58PM -0400, Ivan Krstić wrote: > "Eventually, Negroponte added, Windows might be the sole operating > system ... Negroponte said he was mainly concerned with putting as > many laptops as possible in children's hands." > > -- via Associated Press > <http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hXa0O9XLMsWfaqt-sI9FqFy2IewgD9073PPG0 > >
Naughty Ivan, you are quoting out of context: "Eventually, Negroponte added, Windows might be the sole operating system, and Sugar would be educational software running on top of it." Considering the complete sentence, it is clear to me that this is a case of the reporter being confused by technology. We all know that Sugar could never run on Windows as well it as can run on Linux. The laptop might run Windows or Linux or both, but not Sugar on Windows. The article continues: "That might disappoint advocates of open-source software who helped bankroll OLPC and cheered the challenge it represented to Microsoft's dominance." Sure, I would be disappointed. But let's look at that scenario. Suppose OLPC was bought out by Microsoft and all laptops came loaded with Windows. OK, at least we still have Sugar. The game changes thusly: How long will it take to make Sugar better than the proprietary alternatives? But that's basically the same game we are playing, in any case. And we have been playing that game for decades and winning. The article continues: "Wayan Vota, whose OLPC News blog reported Bender's departure Monday, said he feared Sugar would get neglected on XOs that run Windows." Whose side is Wayan Vota on anyhow? I am not sure whether he is biased, but his ability to analyze news is nil. He's a rumor mill. He thrives on hyperbole and unconfirmed reports. Get a grip people. At least Ivan quoted this part properly: "Negroponte said he was mainly concerned with putting as many laptops as possible in children's hands." I don't know about you, but that makes sense to me. Carol Lerche is right: we need to be pragmatic and get this laptop into the hands of the children who can benefit even if that means our software stack is tainted with a little proprietary software. By my judgment, I'm glad Richard Stallman isn't running OLPC. He would have delayed the launch until we have a GPL'd replacement for the mesh firmware. As it is now, we have a laptop which is more pure license-wise than any other laptop available at about half the cost of the competition. And we have had mesh networking in production for about six months. Who else has mesh networking? Nobody. That's not an ideal position; we should replace the firmware. None the less, it is a pretty good position. To hold that position, we have got to stop wasting time discussing FUD and make the software work. As I noted, we have to do that anyway, even if we didn't have a lovely green laptop as a delivery platform. The race is on for educational software. Even when teachers are smart enough to prefer free software, teachers are going to use whatever software is available. Let's make free software available. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel