On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Martin Langhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For example, we may have a "sugar" build with the latest > > sugar UI bits, a "security" build which implements Bitfrost more > > fully, a "printers" build which works on printer support, > > That makes sense if (when) there is enough people - the overhead of > maintaining and testing additional builds is important.
I think we should very careful about the complexity and the maintenance costs brought by additional builds. Even just the joyride/stable distinction brought more confusion than benefits so far ihmo. I'm not opposed to make image builds more distributed on the long run. I just think we have worst problem to fight with at the moment. > > > an "activities" build which tries to collect all the best activities from > > the community, etc. > > I want to have that "activities" build too 8-) I'm not really convinced it should be a separate build. Just ship a set of core activities and make it really easy to install new ones (we have already everything in place to do so). Marco _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
