On 07.05.2008, at 21:46, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > >> Well, my trust in OLPC is being probed every other day. I take your >> word, and I trust a few other people there, but I also have to >> acknowledge that priorities at OLPC are changing. So much so that >> some >> of the people I trusted most are leaving. >> >> And it's certainly no coincidence that the list of activities in >> olpc3 >> is what Kim wanted in ticket 6598. You certainly remember the >> discussions. >> >> We'll see. If this fear is unfunded, all the better. > > have you even looked at the build.log > > you would see > > Parsing package install arguments > No package fonts-thai-ttf available. > No package olpc-library-core available. > No package olpc-library-common available. > No package olpc-licenses available. > No package squeak-vm available. > No package etoys available. > No package olpc-logos available. > No package olpc-hardware-manager available. > No package olpc-utils available. > No package libabiword available. > No package pyabiword available. > No package libabiword-plugins available. > No package GConf2-dbus available. > No package hulahop available. > Resolving Dependencies
What does this have to do with the activities list being trimmed down? (or selected activities being added - not sure if you started from a build with or without activities) > this is not because we dont want these things only that i'm trying > to get > built up a environment that will at least boot and allow for > testing. the > only reason ive not yet announced anything is because it doesnt boot > let > alone provide something that is useful for testing and moving forward. The squeak-vm and etoys rpms and srpms are in my joyride public rpm repo. They should work fine. If not, let me know. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
