seth wrote: > > > > Of course. Sugar is not dead, just OLPC. That's why the fork occurred. > > > > Sugarlabs isn't a fork. The code bases are still the same and > aren't going to change. It's more like upstream sources now. > Or a forking of management, not code.
devil's advocate: how would someone on the outside (of either OLPC, or sugarlabs) know that that is the case? all that has happened (from the public view of things) is that this new wiki has sprung up, claiming essentially that "this is where sugar lives". there's been no "announcement" (that i've seen), and no corresponding announcement from OLPC, so an observer is sort of left to wonder what's going on. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (arlington, ma, where it's 57.4 degrees) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
