On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 13:44 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote: > Daniel, > > It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library > in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the > journal). We didn't want the old gnomevfs library since that pulled in > the old bonobo horror as a dependency. I'm not familiar with libgnome, > and therefore have no opinion there.
My mistake - we already ship gnome-vfs2 and are not dropping it. A sugar component actually requires it. Enabling gnome-vfs2 support in xulrunner should not be an issue. libgnome is the component which is a dependency headache. Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
