On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:00 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> > I guess GConf2-dbus provides an equivalent interface to the GConf2 >> > package and hence is a drop-in replacement. >> >> Oh ok, that make sense and I guess it's the case here... > > So do we want to use GConf2-dbus like we did for update1, or are we ok > to stick with plain old GConf2 in 8.2?
I'm not sure. The reason people didn't want plain GConf in the build was the ORBit dependency. Now I'm not sure if the problem there was disk space, memory or what else. I guess we should measure... Or we can ask Jim, I think he was one of the ORBit haters :) Marco _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
