J5, We're rebasing OLPC to F9, and are wondering about gnome-vfs2 vs GConf. It looks like you touched upon this area in the past.
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:22 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:00 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > >> > I guess GConf2-dbus provides an equivalent interface to the GConf2 > >> > package and hence is a drop-in replacement. > >> > >> Oh ok, that make sense and I guess it's the case here... > > > > So do we want to use GConf2-dbus like we did for update1, or are we ok > > to stick with plain old GConf2 in 8.2? > > I'm not sure. The reason people didn't want plain GConf in the build > was the ORBit dependency. Now I'm not sure if the problem there was > disk space, memory or what else. I guess we should measure... Do you have any opinion on whether we should continue using GConf2-dbus rather than GConf2? Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
