>>>>> For distro packaging, we should focus only on the stable release >>>>> branches: 0.82.x, and once it's out next year, 0.84.x. >>>>> >>>>> That said, we might package 0.83.x releases in debian unstable and >>>>> thus ubuntu jaunty with a view to landing 0.84 without a large delta >>>>> when it does release, because that might be after the ubuntu feature >>>>> freeze. >>>> >>>> Cool, so sounds like something that will eventually be good to get >>>> into rawhide then. >>> >>> Totally, perhaps someone would like to help us here? >>> >>> Normally, OLPC contractors will be updating the rpms in OLPC-4, and >>> we'll try to maintain devel updated as well, though it's quite a bit >>> of work. If someone wanted to take that work out from our shoulders, >>> would be awesome. >> >> Yep, I can help out with that. I've been helping gregdek with getting >> some of the OLPC changes upstream so as to get as much as possible >> into mainline Fedora so the OLPC guys can concentrate on more >> important stuff. I've got a list of most of the issues from 8.2 but >> arrived on the scene a little late to have much impact there. So now >> that we're rebasing to F-10 I'll be working to minimise the >> requirement of package forks. > > That sounds like music to my hears! > > I think that we are using #olpc-devel in OFTC to work on the F10 > rebase, feel free to join us.
OFTC? > About updating sugar in rawhide, perhaps you can just watch out the > commits in the OLPC-4 branches and decide yourself when to update > Rawhide? I did this comparison from Fedora mainline to joyride 2514 for a 8.2 comparison, I guess quite a bit of it will be still relevant. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-October/msg00025.html Peter _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
