On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> For distro packaging, we should focus only on the stable release >>>>>> branches: 0.82.x, and once it's out next year, 0.84.x. >>>>>> >>>>>> That said, we might package 0.83.x releases in debian unstable and >>>>>> thus ubuntu jaunty with a view to landing 0.84 without a large delta >>>>>> when it does release, because that might be after the ubuntu feature >>>>>> freeze. >>>>> >>>>> Cool, so sounds like something that will eventually be good to get >>>>> into rawhide then. >>>> >>>> Totally, perhaps someone would like to help us here? >>>> >>>> Normally, OLPC contractors will be updating the rpms in OLPC-4, and >>>> we'll try to maintain devel updated as well, though it's quite a bit >>>> of work. If someone wanted to take that work out from our shoulders, >>>> would be awesome. >>> >>> Yep, I can help out with that. I've been helping gregdek with getting >>> some of the OLPC changes upstream so as to get as much as possible >>> into mainline Fedora so the OLPC guys can concentrate on more >>> important stuff. I've got a list of most of the issues from 8.2 but >>> arrived on the scene a little late to have much impact there. So now >>> that we're rebasing to F-10 I'll be working to minimise the >>> requirement of package forks. >> >> That sounds like music to my hears! >> >> I think that we are using #olpc-devel in OFTC to work on the F10 >> rebase, feel free to join us. > > OFTC?
Sorry: http://www.oftc.net/oftc/ >> About updating sugar in rawhide, perhaps you can just watch out the >> commits in the OLPC-4 branches and decide yourself when to update >> Rawhide? > > I did this comparison from Fedora mainline to joyride 2514 for a 8.2 > comparison, I guess quite a bit of it will be still relevant. > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-October/msg00025.html Yes, I see it quite in line with http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Distro_Version_Migration_Nastiness . What do you think? I see that today Denis forked SDL_mixer to drop the MIDI samples. Perhaps next step would be to drop the unneeded GNOME packages? Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
