On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 13:44, Martin Langhoff <martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote: > In other words: @all@ is a valid workaround in all the scenarios I can > think of.
@all@ should have the same effect in the UI as @online@, but with a potential difference in the performance: @all@ is the conventional shared roster and would send you presence for everyone registered on the server, whereas @online@ is a bit more magic and only sends you presence for people who are actually on line at the time. Perhaps some of its magic smoke escaped. @online@ is more useful for servers where only a (small) percentage of the registered users are on line at a time. Regards Morgan _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list server-de...@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
