On 24.02.2009, at 20:43, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:29:57PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > >> I'm not clear why Sugar needs more protection from rogue activities >> than a normal desktop environment has from rogue applications. > It's not that Sugar needs more protection than currently existing > desktop environments, but rather that _all_ desktop environments > need it (but currently lack it). In fact, I hope that other DEs will > start using Rainbow as well, even if just optionally.
+1 Besides, if we didn't feel that children deserved better than the currently popular systems we would not have started Sugar development in the first place. Security is one aspect of this. - Bert - _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
