Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Drake <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/10/22 Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]>: >>> What would be more reliable in the under a tree use case: ad-hoc or >>> mesh with a max of 1 hop? >> Mesh, since everyone does their own beaconing. > > That's my guess too. But the hard-to-answer question is "how much more > reliable"? So we can answer "is it worth the big effort"?
There is only one way to find out. Both Salut (Clique and Avahi) and 802.11 ad-hoc beaconing have complex behavior in the face of unreliable connections. I do not think we are likely to be able to predict the result of their interaction. That's why OLPC has a testing team.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
