so follow the red hat scheme of .arch OLPC/XObuildnumber.FC11.via.iso and .rpm?
Not that I have a personal XO 1.5 but got my greedly little hands on one for FOSE demoing this week ;-/, but alas it has to go back today, and very little time to play with it, much less install a testing build... (actually not allow to install anything on it, as agreement from lender...) BTW: ran into someone who had been to SCALE? and saw the XO stuff there... On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Sascha Silbe <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:47:33PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > >> http://people.sugarlabs.org/bernie/olpc/f11-xo1-py/os115.img >> http://people.sugarlabs.org/bernie/olpc/f11-xo1-py/os115.crc >> http://people.sugarlabs.org/bernie/olpc/f11-xo1-py/os115.img.fs.zip > > Can we agree on some naming scheme that distinguishes between F11-on-XO1.5 > and F11-on-XO1? Having both named exactly the same is rather confusing. > >> * Add patent-encumbered multimedia codecs (gstreamer-plugins-bad) > > So who can legally > a) distribute and > b) use > this image? > > CU Sascha > > -- > http://sascha.silbe.org/ > http://www.infra-silbe.de/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLreXXAAoJELpz82VMF3DaPiMH/AthKA7MZNtiPv3X8QSzJShW > ywa8DAqQ8vXpKFmY1MG/L/bnkWIHwPWjQ1qrU1s1LXTXToGTjU/bzSzJtknDepF/ > Pn3P7a50Y2lzrmfYmmFa/VVWzf9DvWnkKifgOSJABdJxDkbhho2FyPI/2GWces8k > HGrq3lvNY6HqWbJw8x46Nxetg68C66gY+aX2e5JRgEBD0ywkiT82C5oTb6HIa08f > +hSWLmvOzsX2B9gRA6OtJdxhFtZHJaIYSESPEepHpptQ52aCzOsuG/p/RUch7uzU > z2SIcIr5u4mMC3bxSRFI7WZP92PA61TE0eH8BpwiCITlyxdZvbYiv7ndmEFbqLk= > =NcJv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > -- DancesWithCars leave the wolves behind ;-) _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
