I'll go with Mikus on that. With at least 3 development streams some qualifier is needed in the naming. eg os115x1/os115x15/os115py
--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Mikus Grinbergs <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mikus Grinbergs <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: New F11 XO-1build 115 Paraguay > To: "Bernie Innocenti" <[email protected]> > Cc: "OLPC Devel" <[email protected]>, "Fedora OLPC List" > <[email protected]> > Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 7:38 PM > In my opinion, the name selected for > this Paraguay build can create > quite a bit of confusion. > > It used to be possible to distinguish within current > development of > F11-based builds by their naming -- 11 (or thereabouts) > from Parrish for > the XO-1, 67 (or thereabouts) from Innocenti for the XO-1, > 116 (or > thereabouts) from Ball for the XO-1.5. [64 and 200 > were signed - so > somewhat "outsiders".] > > Now every mention of "115" will have to be qualified "-- I > mean the one > focused for Paraguay"" versus "-- I mean the one for > general XO-1.5 > testing". > > Bah, mikus > > _______________________________________________ > olpc mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/olpc > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
