On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 01:47 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: > Unfortunately Record.activity is not really working yet. Filed #1931 with > sugarlabs.
Is this on the XO-1.5, or also on the XO-1? I tested Record v65 yesterday on os129py and it was perfect. > ntpdate is missing from the builds. Easy to add but maybe should > be there to begin with. What is it needed for? Does NM use it on connection to synchronize the systrem clock? > Finally, I guess you have thought of it, but by the > time 10.2 will be out F11 repositories will be down > and thus the builds totally frozen software-wise. I think it would have been better to rebase on F12 6 months ago. Now it's way too close to the release date :-( > Is there anyway to mirror and keep them (without any updating) > somewhere till migration to F>11, so at least if a component > is needed can be found at that time? Repositories for end-of-life releases are just moved to permanent archives which are mirrored in fewer locations. For example: http://archive.kernel.org/fedora-archive/ -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
