--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote:
> From: Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> > Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119 > To: "Peter Robinson" <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > Cc: "Devel" <devel@lists.laptop.org>, "Fedora OLPC" > <fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com> > Date: Monday, April 12, 2010, 9:15 AM > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 17:57 +0100, > Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> Finally, I guess you have thought of it, but > by the > > >> time 10.2 will be out F11 repositories will > be down > > >> and thus the builds totally frozen > software-wise. > > > > > > I think it would have been better to rebase on > F12 6 months ago. > > > Now it's way too close to the release date :-( > > > > I recommended F-12 which was in beta when this process > started but was > > ignored. I noticed the other day that dsd has created > a F-12 branch in > > git but I think we should be aiming straight for F-13 > now. It'll be > > out in a little over a month, is quite stable already > and have will be > > supported for another 14 months. > > +1 > > F13, btw, seems like a very solid release to me. I do not know why re-basing on F13 will reach deployment status much faster than F11 and will not be at the same point a year from now. The XO is a _production_ machine. Makes no sense to run development/short-lived OS. Maybe the RHEL/CentOS idea should not be dismissed, if feasible. > > -- > // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ > \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > olpc mailing list > o...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/olpc > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel