On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:07:12PM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: > > It's particularly significant because (when the release goes final) it > > means we have synchronized software between XO-1 and XO-1.5. > > Are we aiming for a "synchronised" 10.1.2 for XO-1 and XO-1.5? > If this is just for xo1, 10.1.1-xo1 might be a better moniker... > [ I am still eyeing some bugs -- ie: screen rotation -- for a 10.1.2 ... ]
While that bug #9350 is important, I don't think it should hold up a 10.1.2 synchronised release. If that means the XO-1.5 build number doesn't change from os206, so be it. (However, I'd be surprised if we didn't need to fix something on XO-1.5 to get everything working between XO-1 and XO-1.5.) I'm easy either way; #9350 might be fixed and released in 10.1.2 or a 10.1.3, but it would be better fixed earlier than later. It is an obvious regression from XO-1 to XO-1.5. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel