On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Mikus Grinbergs <mi...@bga.com> wrote: >> For now, please don't file bugs unless you include patches. > > I can understand not wanting bug reports against items which OLPC/Sugar > are still in the process of changing. But why defer reporting problems > which might not be addressed unless there was a report ?
Just to take a stab at answer.... Because Daniel is tired. He has been on the road for months/years solving other peoples problems. Now he is spending some time (I hesitate to call it 'free' time) working on a project which is personally interesting.... while generously sharing it with the world. If anyone wants to set up a formal bug tracker... and work on those bugs I am sure Daniel would be happy to work _with_ them. But for now, he has enough on his hands. Based on his track record for getting things done, I am inclined to give Daniel the benefit of the doubt that what he is doing will become the basis of a future software release! david > For instance, Read-87 fails to launch on XO-1 os1 (F14) when it tries to > 'import evince'. Though the necessary gnome-python2-evince package was > not included in the os1 build, when I manually install that package from > the yum Fedora-14 repositories, the import statement still fails -- > apparently because the evince.so module provided by the current > Fedora-14 package has internal inconsistencies. I myself do not have a > Python test case which does 'import evince' - nor do I have a patch - > but perhaps the maintainers of the Read Activity might want to discuss > this situation with the maintainers of Python on Fedora 14. > > mikus > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel