On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: > On 4 September 2010 03:24, Mikus Grinbergs <mi...@bga.com> wrote: >>> For now, please don't file bugs unless you include patches. >> >> I can understand not wanting bug reports against items which OLPC/Sugar >> are still in the process of changing. But why defer reporting problems >> which might not be addressed unless there was a report ? > > Because nobody other than me is fixing the problems right now, and the > bugs will go stale. And if someone is available to fix bugs, you only > have to spend 5 minutes working with the image to encounter several of > them. A bug tracker is needless overhead for such early and "loose" > development.
Well I am for SoaS related things which while isn't XO hardware related it does affect everything further up the stack.... does that not count :-( > This of course will change with time, if the project continues to progress. > >> For instance, Read-87 fails to launch on XO-1 os1 (F14) when it tries to >> 'import evince'. Though the necessary gnome-python2-evince package was >> not included in the os1 build, when I manually install that package from >> the yum Fedora-14 repositories, the import statement still fails -- >> apparently because the evince.so module provided by the current >> Fedora-14 package has internal inconsistencies. I myself do not have a >> Python test case which does 'import evince' - nor do I have a patch - >> but perhaps the maintainers of the Read Activity might want to discuss >> this situation with the maintainers of Python on Fedora 14. > > As this is a topic purely related to Sugar you are welcome to file a > bug on the SL bug tracker, or start a discussion on the sugar mailing > list. No point as its directly Fedora related but if people could add positive karma to this it would be fixed quicker, else in about 4-5 days it will head to F-14 stable. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-python2-desktop-2.31.1-5.fc14 > I should also clarify that if you have an easy solution for a bug > (such as: add package XYZ) you are welcome to file a bug - by "only > file bugs with patches" I guess I meant "only file bugs with patches > or simple solutions" > > I'm just trying to focus and organize the OS-level work, and to avoid > wasting time on bug tracking in this early stage. Thanks for working > with me on this... > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > olpc mailing list > o...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/olpc > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel